Date: July
12, 1995
To: Rick Sarnelli, Raytheon Corporation
Fr: Mark Ingle, US EPA, Office of Water, Engineering
and Analysis Division
Re: Metal Finishing (40 CFR 433) Categorical Standard
Applicability
Introduction
On July 10, 1995, Rick Sarnelli called Mark Ingle
to discuss the applicability of the Metal Finishing (40 CFR 433)
categorical standard to industrial operations at a manufacturing
site. Mr. Sarnelli posed the following question: If a facility
has only one of the six "core" operations listed in
40 CFR 433 (e.g., electroplating, electroless plating, anodizing,
etc.), but has many of the other 40 "non-core" operations
(e.g., cleaning, machining, grinding, etc.), and the core operation
is closed-looped such that there are no wastewater discharges
from this operation, are discharges from the other 40 "non-core"
operations at the facility still covered under the categorical
standard?
Discussion
Mark Ingle reviewed available documents and discussed
this issue with senior Engineering and Analysis Division (EAD)
staff. The attached Federal
Register page includes the highlighted
section that EAD staff referenced as being related to this issue.
As shown, the highlighted section states that if a plant "performs
any of the six operations [i.e., the "core" operations],"
then "discharges from the 46 operations" are covered
by the categorical standard. Because this language includes the
term "performed" and not "performed with discharge,"
EAD staff have historically interpreted this clause to mean that
if any of the "core" operations are performed at a site,
regardless of their discharge status, then effluent from all 46
of the regulated processes are covered by the categorical standard.
Conclusion
The historical precedent set by EAD staff on this
issue suggests that for the case posed by Mr. Sarnelli, discharges
from all 46 of the operations regulated by Metal Finishing (40
CFR 433) would be regulated if any one of the "core"
processes were performed at the site, regardless of the "core"
processes discharge status.