A GUIDEBOOK ON HOW TO COMPLY WITH THE CHROMIUM ELECTROPLATINGAND ANODIZING NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS

CHAPTER 4

WHAT DO I NEED TO DO TO COMPLY?

TABLE 4-1. EMISSION LIMITS

Affected tanks
Control levela
Control technique
Hard Chromium Plating Tanks
Small, existing tanksb
0.03 mg/dscm (1.3 x 10­5 gr/dscf)
packed-bed scrubber (PBS)
Large, existing tanks and all new tanks
0.015 mg/dscm (6.6 x 10­6 gr/dscf)
composite mesh-pad (CMP) system
Decorative Chromium Plating Tanks Using a Chromic Acid Bath
All tanks
0.01 mg/dscm(4.4 x 10­6 gr/dscf) or
fume suppressants (FS) or
45 dynes/cm(3.1 x 10­3 lbf/ft)
FS that contains wetting agent
Decorative Chromium Plating Tanks Using a Trivalent Chromium Bath
All tanks
Only subject to recordkeeping and reporting
Chromium Anodizing Tanks
All tanks
0.01 mg/dscm (4.4 x 10­6 gr/dscf) or
FS or
45 dynes/cm(3.1 x 10­3 lbf/ft)
FS that contains wetting agent

a mg/dscm = milligrams per dry standard cubic meter of exhaust air;

gr/dscf = grains per dry standard cubic feet of exhaust air;

dynes/cm = dynes per centimeter;

lbf/ft = pound-force per foot.

bSmall means a facility having a maximum potential rectifier capacity of less than 60 million ampere-hours per year (assuming an operating schedule of 8,400 hours per year and a 70 percent tank utilization) or an actual rectifier capacity of less than 60 million ampere-hours per year demonstrated through the use of nonresettable meters. Existing means installed before 12/16/93 (proposal date of regulation).11234

TABLE 4-2. SUMMARY OF WORK PRACTICE STANDARDS

Control technique
Work practice standards
Frequency
Packed-bed scrubber (PBS) Visually inspect device to ensure there is proper drainage, no chromic acid buildup on the packed beds, and no evidence of chemical attack on the structural integrity of the device. 1/quarter
Visually inspect back portion of the chevron-blade mist eliminator to ensure that it is dry and there is no breakthrough of chromic acid mist. 1/quarter
Visually inspect ductwork from tank or tanks to the control device to ensure there are no leaks. 1/quarter
Add fresh makeup water to the top of the packed bed.a,b Whenever makeup is added
Composite mesh-pad (CMP) system Visually inspect device to ensure there is proper drainage, no chromic acid buildup on the pads, and no evidence of chemical attack on the structural integrity of the device. 1/quarter
Visually inspect back portion of the mesh pad closest to the fan to ensure there is no breakthrough of chromic acid mist. 1/quarter
Visually inspect ductwork from tank or tanks to the control device to ensure there are no leaks. 1/quarter
Perform washdown of the composite mesh-pads in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. Per manufacturer
PBS/CMP system Same as for CMP system. Same as for CMP system
Fiber-bed mist eliminatorc Visually inspect fiber-bed unit and prefiltering device to ensure there is proper drainage, no chromic acid buildup in the units, and no evidence of chemical attack on the structural integrity of the devices. 1/quarter
Visually inspect ductwork from the tank(s) to the control device to ensure there are no leaks. 1/quarter
Perform washdown of fiber elements in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. Per manufacturer
Other air pollution control device (APCD) To be proposed by the source for approval by the Administrator. Proposed by the source for approval by the Administrator

TABLE 4-2. SUMMARY OF WORK PRACTICE STANDARDS (continued)

Monitoring equipment
Work practice standards
Frequency
Pitot tube Backflush with water, or remove from the duct and rinse with fresh water. Replace in the duct and rotate 180 degrees to ensure that the same zero reading is obtained. Check pitot tube ends for damage. Replace pitot tube if cracked or fatigued. 1/quarter
Stalagmometerd Follow manufacturer's recommendations. Per manufacturer

aIf greater than 50 percent of the scrubber water is drained (e.g., for maintenance purposes), makeup water may be added to the scrubber basin.

bFor horizontal-flow scrubbers, top is defined as the section of the unit directly above the packing media such that the makeup water would flow perpendicular to the air flow through the packing. For vertical-flow units, the top is defined as the area downstream of the packing material such that the makeup water would flow countercurrent to the air flow through the unit.

cWork practice standards for the control device installed upstream of the fiber-bed mist eliminator to prevent plugging do not apply as long as the work practice standards for the fiber-bed unit are followed.

dDevice used to measure the surface tension of the bath.3

SUMMARY OF THE REQUIREMENTS

The major requirements of the regulation can be categorized as follows:

Decorative chromium electroplaters must be in compliance with the regulation by January 25, 1996. Hard chromium electroplaters and chromium anodizers must be in compliance with the regulation by January 25, 1997.

Emission limits and work practice requirements are discussed in this chapter. Testing and monitoring requirements are covered in Chapter 5, and recordkeeping and reporting requirements are discussed in Chapter 6.

In addition, a detailed "table of contents" of the regulation is included in Appendix D of this guidebook. It lists the requirements of the regulation and gives the section of the regulation where these requirements are found.

EMISSION LIMITS

The regulation specifies emission limits (expressed as concentration of chromium) that can typically be achieved by the use of a certain technique to reduce emissions (such as a control device or fume suppressant). The emission limits are presented in Table 4­1. The emission reduction technique that corresponds to the emission limit is shown in parentheses in Table 4­1.

What is meant by "small"? As shown in Table 4-1, small, existing hard chromium electroplating tanks have a less stringent emission limit to meet than large hard chromium electroplating tanks. A source is considered small by definition if the maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity of all hard chromium electroplating tanks within the facility is less than 60 million ampere-hours per year.

For example... A facility having both hard chromium electroplating and chromium anodizing tanks ducted to the same control device would only consider the rectifier capacity associated with the hard plating tanks in determining the size. However, a facility having a series of hard plating tanks ducted to a control device in one building and another series of hard plating tanks ducted to a control device in a different building must consider the total capacity of all tanks in determining size because size must be determined for all hard plating tanks within the facility boundaries.

If the maximum rectifier capacity is 60 million ampere-hours per year, a source may demonstrate that it should be considered small instead of large by using either of the following procedures:

How do I calculate the maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity? The maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity is based on a maximum potential operating schedule of 8,400 hours per year for the facility and assumes that each tank is in operation for 70 percent of the total operating hours.

For example... To calculate the maximum cumulative potential rectifier capacity for a facility, sum the total installed rectifier capacities associated with all hard plating tanks (SCR in amperes) and multiply this sum by 8,400 hours/year and 0.7, as shown below:

What is meant by "existing"? A tank qualifies as "existing" if it was installed before December 16, 1993, which was the date this regulation was proposed in the Federal Register.

Which control technique should I use to meet the emission limit? As mentioned above, the emission limits are based on the level of control that can be maintained using a certain control technique. However, you may choose to use another control technique, as long as you can meet the emission limit for your type of facility. The following paragraphs discuss the control techniques in Table 4­1.

Typical control efficiencies are also given in the following paragraphs. But, beware that actual performance levels may vary from these typical values, depending on such factors as the inlet conditions and how well the control devices are operated and maintained. For more information on how these typical control efficiencies were derived, see Chapters 4 and 5 of EPA's Chromium Emissions from Chromium Electroplating and Chromic Acid Anodizing Operations--Background Information for Proposed Standards (Volume I) (EPA­453/R­93030a). For information on the availability of this document, see Chapter 10 of this guidebook.

Packed-bed scrubbers are typically used to reduce emissions of chromic acid mist from electroplating and anodizing tanks. Both single and double packed-bed designs are used. Chromic acid mist is removed from the gas stream primarily by droplets impacting on packing media. First, the gas stream is wetted by spraying water countercurrent to the gas flow to enlarge the droplet size. The gas stream then passes through the packed bed(s) where the droplets impinge on the packing media. The regulation requires periodic washing of packing material using an overhead weir.

In most cases, the packed-bed section of the scrubber is followed by a mist eliminator section comprised of a single chevron-blade mist eliminator. The mist eliminator removes any water entrained from the packed-bed section. Treated gases then pass through an induced draft fan and out a stack or exhaust vent. The scrubber water is usually recirculated and periodically tapped and discharged to the electroplating tanks as makeup solution.

Typical efficiencies of packed-bed scrubbers are 97 percent for decorative chromium electroplating and anodizing tanks and 99 percent for hard chromium electroplating tanks. Schematics of a single packed­bed scrubber and a double packed­bed scrubber are provided in Figures 4­1 and 4­2, respectively. Figure 4­3 is a schematic of a chevron­blade mist eliminator.

Composite mesh pads consist of layers of interlocked fibers densely packed between two supporting grids. The composite mesh pad was developed to remove small particles (< 5mm or 0.2 mils) that were not effectively controlled by conventional technologies. The layers of material in composite pads are arranged with the smallest diameter fiber layer located in the center of the pad and progressively larger diameter layers located on both sides of the center. Particles collide with the fibers in the pad and adhere to their surfaces. These captured particles coalesce into larger droplets as they travel through the small-diameter fiber layers in the center of the pad. These enlarged particles either drain to the bottom of the unit or are reentrained in the gas stream. The reentrained particles are then captured by the large-diameter fiber layers in the back of the pad. A schematic of a typical composite mesh­pad is provided in Figure 4­4.

Composite mesh-pad systems incorporate a larger particle removal system prior to the composite mesh pad to reduce the plugging potential of the pad. The large particle removal system can either be a series of larger diameter mesh pads or a packed-bed scrubber section.

Typical removal efficiencies associated with this control device are greater than 99 percent.

Fume suppressants are compounds that are added directly to the bath to reduce or inhibit misting. Fume suppressants include: wetting agents, foam blankets, and combinations that include both a wetting agent and a foam blanket. An important distinction between wetting agents and foam blankets is how they reduce emissions. Wetting agents reduce or inhibit misting by lowering the surface tension of the bath. When the surface tension of the solution is reduced, gases escape at the surface of the solution with less of a "bursting" effect, forming less mist. Foam blankets do not preclude the formation of chromic acid mist, but rather trap the mist formed under a blanket of foam. The foam blanket is formed by agitation produced by the hydrogen and oxygen gas bubbles generated during electroplating. Once formed, the foam blanket is usually maintained at a thickness of 1.3 to 2.5 cm (0.5 to 1.0 in.) and covers the entire surface of the bath.

Fume suppressants typically reduce chromium emissions by more than 99 percent.

What if I want to use a different control technique? You may use another control technique, as long as you meet the emission limit for your type of facility. You do not need EPA approval to choose another technique; however, you must get EPA approval on the monitoring parameters and test methods that you will use. An example of another control technique that may be used is the fiber-bed mist eliminator, which is described below.

Fiber-bed mist eliminators mostly have been used to reduce acid mists from sulfuric, phosphoric, and nitric acid plants. These systems remove contaminants from a gas stream through the mechanisms of inertial impaction and Brownian diffusion. Fiber-bed units are designed for horizontal, concurrent gas-liquid flow through the bed. The contaminated gas stream flows toward the downstream face of the bed. The acid mist in the gas stream impacts on the surface of the fibers and drains down the outer face of the bed to the sump while the cleaned gas flows up and out the top of the unit. A schematic of a typical fiber-bed mist eliminator is presented in Figure 4­5.

Fiber-bed mist eliminators are typically installed downstream of an existing control system. The upstream device removes the majority of the emissions and thus prevents plugging of the fiber bed.

Adequate test data are not available to accurately quantify the control efficiency of fiber-bed mist eliminators. However, EPA believes that these systems can achieve the emission limits that were based on the use of composite mesh-pad systems and fume suppressants based on qualitative data available.

WORK PRACTICES

Besides complying with the emission limits discussed above, you will also be required to perform work practice standards. Work practice standards are required to ensure that the control technique you use to comply with the regulation is properly maintained. Poor maintenance could result in system degradation over time, and eventually lead to an increase in emissions. Work practice standards must be performed quarterly in most cases. The requirements vary slightly depending on which control device you use, as shown in Table 4­2.

In addition to these work practices, you will also be required to write an operation and maintenance (O&M) plan for your facility. (Decorative chromium electroplating operations that use a trivalent chromium bath do not have to prepare an O&M plan.) The O&M plan must be developed and implemented by the compliance date for your facility. However,you do not have to submit your plan to EPA. The O&M plan will include:

You may use any standard operating procedure (SOP) manuals, vendor O&M manuals, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) plans, or other existing plans as part of your O&M plan, as long as they meet the criteria in the regulation.


Back to Table of Contents