II. R&D NEEDS AND POTENTIAL PROJECTS
1. Background
Chromium, both hexavalent and trivalent forms, is an industrial
material that has been used throughout the metal finishing industry
for many years. The hexavalent form has been particularly useful
in hard and decorative chromium plating, anodizing aluminum, and
producing conversion coating on light metals. There are no viable
alternatives for many parts using one or more of these coatings.
There are many other metal processing solutions containing hexavalent
chromium. It is commonly used for etching metals prior to bonding,
for passivating steel to prevent corrosion, and for stripping
of some organic materials from metal surfaces. Additionally,
hexavalent chromium is produced in solutions when chromium is
stripped from steel using anodic treatment in alkali solutions.
Chromium, especially hexavalent chromium, has come under increasing
regulatory scrutiny because of its listing as a human carcinogen
with an inhalation exposure pathway. There has not been sufficient
documentation of the risk factors associated with the chemicals
used in the metal finishing industry for that industry to feel
the increased regulatory scrutiny is warranted.
2. Federal Survey
By far, hexavalent chromium has received the most attention and
resources. Many projects have recently been and are being supported
by the Federal sector. The Federal survey identified contributors
from DOD, DOE, and EPA. In addition, the Pacific Northwest database
showed that a few State programs are funding chromium pollution
prevention research, at a total level of $200K for the States.
In all, these two sources showed $21.9M in funding from State
and Federal sources directed at this area.
Most of the resources have been used to develop and demonstrate
alternatives such as nickel alloys for hard chromium, silane and
polymer-based chemistries for chromate conversion coatings, and
dry deposition processes for both hard chrome and conversion coatings.
In general EPA supports work in chromium alternatives at universities
and nonprofit research institutes; DOD supports work at its own
facilities using in-house staff and consultants and in the private
sector; DOE funds work at its national labs and in the private
sector; and the State efforts have been conducted by the private
sector. AESF is supporting a university project in Zn/Ni/SiO2
as a chromate conversion coating alternative.
Within the studies identified by these two sources, EPA and AESF
are the only groups supporting work to improve efficiency and
recover chromium from existing chromium operations; the support
level by EPA for these projects has been about $150K over the
last several years.
3. Projects
There are several R&D priorities associated with the use of
hexavalent chromium processing solutions:
a. Develop simplified risk assessment methodologies to determine
the risks associated with the use of chromium in surface finishing
processes, as indicated below.
i. Assess the risks to workers in different job classifications
from exposures due to working in various plating processes that
use hexavalent chromium.
ii. Assess the risks before and consequent to application of technologies
to meet the new CAAA chromium emissions MACT standard.
b. Develop a life cycle analysis model to determine when, and
when not, to change from processes that use hexavalent chromium.
c. Develop innovative closed-loop processes for chromium processing solutions.
i. Evaluate methods to control discharges to air and water and
to recycle chemicals back into the processing tanks in existing
shops.
ii. Evaluate methods to control discharges to air and water and
to recycle chemicals back into the processing tanks in new
installations--concentrating on the best installations extant.
iii. Demonstrate the electrodialytic membrane based "I3"
technology for chromium recovery.
d. Develop reduced chromium processes.
i. Modified trivalent chrome conversion coatings.
ii. Modified low chromate conversion coatings.
iii. No-rinse chromate conversion coatings.
iv. Modified (low chromium) anodizing baths and etching solutions.
v. Trivalent hard chromium electroplating baths.
vi. Trivalent chromium brush plating solutions.
vii. Non-chromate corrosion inhibitors.
e. Develop alternative materials and processes. Any work in this
area must consider the new waste products (quantities and dangers).
Many alternatives create more by-products than the original processes
(e.g., hard chrome alternatives). When comparing existing chromium
processes to non-chromium processes, state-of-the-art chromium
processes should be used, not the 1940's versions.
i. Alternatives for chromium plating processes.
ii. Alternatives for chromic acid anodizing.
iii. Chromium-free conversion coatings for steels, aluminum, and
zinc.
iv. Stripping of chromium coatings without generating hexavalent
chromium.
v. Chromium-free corrosion inhibitors.
Previous | Next | Table of Contents |