MONTHLY REVIEW
Published
by the
American Electroplaters Society
Publication and Editorial Office
3040 Diversy Ave., Chicago
VOL.
XVII MARCH, 1930 No. 3
EDITORIAL
EXPERIENCE
In
these days of advancing thought neither producing systems nor industrial
methods can remain constant. Systems of yesterday are not those
of today. It is the learning of things, the fuller knowing of things,
that accounts for the change in the doing of things.
There is no such
thing as unrequited mental toil, we are broader and bigger for
it regardless of material consequence. Experience is a great
school. Some learn much from experience, others little; the difference
is a personal matter. Possibly you don’t like the business of plating.
Perhaps you did not choose it, just drifted in or was sort of forced
in and have always imagined yourself a better something else. If you
don’t like, can’t make yourself like the business, one thing
is sure, you will take but little enjoyment out of your daily experience,
while the man who delights in daily contact with new problems will go
after a new idea as voraciously as a hungry infant grabs for a rubber
teat. Nothing spurs a man to greater effort than honest contention, but
don’t argue for the sake of appearing clever. Our Branch meetings
furnish splendid opportunity for honest contention and exchange of opinions.
Are you a regular attendant? The society needs you, you need the society,
it’s a mutual affair so there is no argument over that point. Experience
is the sum total of small affairs and the best way to cash in on the
sum total is to attend the annual convention. There you will meet the
best and broadest men of the electroplating industry. ”Believe
it or not” it will broaden you to hear them talk. The opportunity
is yours, if you neglect it you play a losing game. It’s an inspiring,
broadening experience and you can’t afford to miss it.
Get out and
see what others are doing, it’s a poor plating plant
that possesses no individuality and a poor plater without a notion or
two of his own. A narrow man stays at home and thinks he knows it all.
A broad minded man gets out and sees what is going on in other shops
and the firm that denies its foreman plater this pleasure at least once
each year is ”durned small pertaters.”
Never be ashamed
to ask for information, it will aid in rounding out your experience,
but
be ashamed of your indifference toward the attainment
of practical knowledge. And above all,—BE GENEROUS WITH YOUR EXPERIENCE,
LEND A HELPING HAND WHENEVER YOU CAN, IF YOU HOPE TO EXPERIENCE GENUINE
SATISFACTION.
EXECUTIVE BOARD
MEETING—MARCH 21, 1930
The Executive
Board met in session at the Powers Hotel, Rochester, New York, on Friday,
March 21st,
1930, with President Smith, 2nd Vice President
Kennedy, Past President Feeley, Editor Hanlon and Secretary-treasurer
Gehling, present.
First Vice President
Van Derau telephoned, business at his plant was such, that he regrets
he cannot be present.
Minutes of the
Board were read, and it was recommended that the words ”Research
Committee” be stricken out on the vote of December 1st, 1929. Carried.
Mr.
Geo. B. Hogaboom read his report of the ”Incorporation Committee,” as
follows:
Dear Mr. President:
Directly after
the convention of the A. E. S. in Detroit, July, 1929, you requested
me to arrange to have the A. E. S. incorporated.
A thorough
investigation was made of the incorporation laws of New York, New Jersey;
with the aid of a very competent lawyer, it was claimed that
organizations which have a ruling body, such as our Supreme Society,
always have a constitution to rule the whole organization and by-laws
to govern subordinate bodies, such for example as our Branch societies.
The
A. E. S. has two constitutions, one for the Supreme Society of ruling
body; and one for the subordinate bodies, the Branch societies, there
are no by-laws.
The opinion obtained
is that it would be well for the A. E. S. to have one constitution
and a set of by-laws.
This change cannot be made by me and as I am not a member of the Supreme
Society, I cannot serve upon such a committee.
I am also of
the opinion that you cannot appoint a committee to make this change,
this authority
to do so would have to be given you at a
convention of the Supreme Society, this was not done at Detroit.
I recommend
that the reconstruction of the A. E. S. constitution be brought before
the A. E. S. convention at Washington, D. C., July, 1930, and
that a committee be appointed, if the Society so votes, to make the
necessary changes, this committee to report at the 1931 convention.
It is realized
that this procedure causes a long delay in incorporating the A. E.
S., but there is no other way that would be in accordance with
the present constitution.
I would be pleased
to serve as an adviser to a committee and offer the advantage of my
experience in performing the
work you assigned me.
Geo.
B. Hogaboom.
Motion made the
committee get a lawyer to draft constitution and by-laws so that the
society can be incorporated and the same to be
ready for
presentation to the Washington convention. Carried.
Mr. Philip Sievering reported as treasurer of the Research Committee
as follows:
Receipts
June 1st, 1929, to March 21st, 1930 $1160.21
June 1st, 1929, balance on hand 4539.35
$5699.56 $5699.56
Disbursements
June 1st, 1929, to March 21st, 1930 $3375.43
Balance on hand $2324.13
On the above receipts $675.00 is paid on the 1930 campaign.
Philip Sievering,
Treasurer of Research Committee.
Motion made report
be received. Carried.
Mr. Geo. Hogaboom
reported for the Membership Committee and stated he sent out 3,600
letters and intends
to send out 1,500 more, and this expense
was being borne by him as his contribution to the Society.
The Metal Industry
has donated to the Society one full page in both the Metal Industry
and the Brass World, for advertising for the committee,
to run for six months beginning January 1st, 1930.
Motion made progress report be received. Carried.
Secretary Gehling
reported the inactivity of the. Cincinnati Branch, as the branch was
not holding
meetings and had not paid any P. C. T.
for the past nine months.
It was suggested
that Secretary Gehling notify all members of the Cincinnati branch
of the laxity of their branch and
asking them for suggestions
and their opinions as to the best way to have the branch function again.
Carried.
After discussing
a letter received by the President from one of the branches, the following
resolution was read:
We the Executive
Board in session March 21st, 1930, offer to the Supreme Society in
annual convention at Washington,
D. C., the following resolution:
That
in view of the continued desire of many branches to sell advertising
or solicit funds for annual meetings and banquets, we the Executive
Board, respectfully request to save future executive boards embarrassment,
that
Sec. 3, Article XII, be stricken from our constitution. Carried.
Secretary
was authorized to get new charters printed for the Dayton, Detroit,
Montreal and Newark branches. Carried.
The following
tentative plan towards zoning the branches was adopted by the Executive
Board and
the same to be placed before the Washington
convention:
The location
of the branches are such that it calls for nine zones, so as not to
have the vice-presidents traveling too long a distance
to get
to the branch meetings in their zones.
Instead of calling
the vice-presidents, i. e., first vice-president, second vice-president,
etc., their title
should be vice-president of
zone one, and zone two, etc.
All vice-presidents
should be members of the Executive Board together with the president,
secretary-treasurer,
editor, and the past president.
All
vice-presidents shall keep a record of the progress of the branches
in their respective zones, and see that the branches meet regularly,
and make a report of the same to the Executive Board prior to the annual
meeting or convention, so that the same can be reported at the convention.
Zones
l—St. Louis, Indianapolis, Cincinnati, Dayton. 2—Chicago,
Milwaukee, Grand Rapids. 3—Toledo, Cleveland, Pittsburgh. Montreal,
Toronto. 5—New York, Newark, Philadelphia, Baltimore-Washington.
Rochester, Detroit. 7—Boston, Worcester, Providence. Bridgeport,
Waterbury, Hartford-Connecticut Valley. 9—Los Angeles.
Carried.
The following
letter was read from the Metal Industry:
To the Executive
Officers, A. E. S.
Gentlemen: Referring
to the Rochester meeting.
It is our desire
to cover this meeting, as we have all other similar meetings, but find
that it is a hard matter
to go into the meeting in
detail without being able to refer to the discussion.
We enclose a
copy of the editorial covering the Newark meeting in 1929, and we should
like
to hear if you will grant us permission to cover the
Rochester meeting by referring to the papers read and the discussions.
Yours
truly,
The Metal Industry.
After discussing
the letter, it was the sense of the Executive Board, that we appreciate
the courtesy of the Metal Industry
in asking for the
privilege of reporting the Rochester meeting, and recommend that they
cooperate with the editor of the ”Monthly Review,” Mr. Frank
Hanlon, in reference to the same. Carried.
Meeting was adjourned
at the call of the President.
Geo. Gehling,
Secretary.
MODERN METHODS
OF CLEANING METALS
FOR CHROMIUM PLATING AND THE FUTURE OF CHROMIUM
PLATING
Jacob Hay, Detroit,
Michigan Read at St. Louis Branch,
18th Annual Meeting
With so much
written and published about the cleaning of metals for all kinds of
plating it seems that there is very little
to say about cleaning
metals for chromium plating.
About five years
ago when we first heard about chromium plating, our organization was
approached by a certain
company to chromium plate the
reflectors for Mining Head Light Reflectors, the type that miners use
in coal mines and so forth.
Some time later
chromium plating was specified on such parts as automobile head lamps,
fender lamps and cowell lamp
brackets and later on reflectors.
Chromium
plating was practically new to the platers and therefore countless
troubles were experienced in its commercial application.
Everything seemed
to work out all right in a laboratory scale, but when we started on
a large production basis it appeared at once that the Electro-Plater
had to learn the art of plating all over again.
Better methods
of polishing of base metals, cleaning, closer control of copper, nickel
and chromium
solutions and buffing of metallic coatings
had to be maintained in order to obtain a finish that would be passed
by our inspection department.
Minute scratches,
either in the base metal or metallic deposits, that had been left there
by the polishers and buffers
and also particles that
were carried over by the electro-cleaning solution would be highly
magnified by the highly reflective chromium finish.
One can readily
perceive the number of obstacles which we had to overcome. These troubles
were not
confined to our organization alone. No one contemplating
chromium plating escaped trouble.
Many of you have
noticed that chromium and nickel plates have had some parts peel that
have only been in use
a short time, and that some nickel
plating peels the minute you try to chromium plate the same.
This is due in most cases to improper cleaning and deoxidizing the
base metal surface prior to plating.
Head lamps or fender brackets have, in many cases, shown the brass
base in a very short time. This is caused by either extremely thin
deposits
of nickel or an abundance of hydrogen bound gas which was absorbed
by the pores of the nickel plate during the electrodeposition of the
chromium.
Most
of these troubles were experienced by us about a year ago when the
automobile manufacturers to whom we furnished lamps received complaints
from customers about the chromium finish on their cars. Some of the
vendors
were not prepared to do justice to the class of work that should have
been furnished to the public in order to withstand corrosion, and at
the same time satisfy the production schedule demanded. Most of them
had to learn chromium plating all over again, the same as we had to
do five years before. We fortified ourselves against these troubles
by spending
time and money to develop a chromium finish that would stand up under
the most severe test that could be given our product. Some of the complaints
were justified but most of the complaints were unjustified.
This, I believe,
was largely responsible for the advertising propaganda issued in various
trade journals that chromium plate finish would resist
wear, tarnish, corrosion and what not. The public, reading of this,
or hearing of it, immediately began noticing defects of a minor nature
on
their newly chromium plated decorative automobile parts.
Head lamps, fender
lamps and brackets get the most severe test of all automobile parts
by the inspectors.
In our line of
manufacturing we have only four metals to contend with as far as the
plating, polishing and
buffing department is concerned.
I
will try to explain, step by step, the method we employ in finishing
the same.
In polishing
and buffing we use a buffing composition with not more than 5 per cent
petrolatum. After the metals have been cut down
with tripoli
on the automatic buffing machines or otherwise, and all buffing machine
work and stamping have been completed, the finished parts are cleaned
in a washing machine to remove all tripoli and grease left on the surface
of the metal by the preceding operations. The parts should then be
buffed with a lime composition of high quality. Brass parts are then
ready for
the final cleaning before nickel plating.
I will not go
into any detail to explain the action of different chemicals’ and
emulsifiers that are used. Any one of you that is seeking that information
can find the same in ”Principles of Electro-Plating and Electro-Forming
by Blum and Hogaboom.” They have a very good article on the subject.
We
use a cleaner made up of soda ash, trisodium phosphate, sodium silicate,
rosenate and a very little caustic soda. A fuse cleaner is to be preferred.
We find that the temperature closely controlled in operating a cleaning
solution is one hundred per cent of our success, as the temperature
has a very marged effect on the alkalinite of the cleaners.
The following
method is used in our cleaning cycle: Semi-Automatic cleaning machine,
moving cathode, cleaning time one and one-quarter minute, temperature
of the cleaning solution 200 degrees Fahrenheit, 12 volts-used in the
cleaner, and the brass parts made the cathode. Then into a second cleaner
consisting of nothing else but soda ash, two ounces per gallon of water;
the parts to be cleaned are made the anode for two seconds; the temperature
of this cleaner should be maintained at 150 degrees Fahrenheit; voltage
is 12 volts.
The following
rinse methods are used from cleaner: Water rinse, cyanide dip, water
rinse, acid dip consisting of 20 per cent hydrofluoric
acid,
water rinse, nickel solution of the following composition: 32 ounces nickel
sulphate
11 ounces nickel chloride
4 ounces boric acid
2 ounces sodium sulphate
This solution
is maintained at temperature of 120 degrees Fahrenheit, P. H. 5.9,
metal content not lower than 6 ounces
per gallon, nickel chloride
content, 10 to 11 ounces per gallon.
We plate our
head lamps 13 minutes at 30 amperes per square foot. This gives us
a deposit of three-ten-thousandths
of an inch of nickel. This
amount of nickel is very essential for a good substantial chromium
finish.
In
preparing zinc die castings for nickel and chromium plating our procedure
is the same as for brass, with only two exceptions: we do not use the
second cleaner with the soda ash and the reverse current, and after
dipping the zinc castings in hydrofluoric acid we go direct into the
nickel solution
without rinsing in water. The nickel solution here used is:
10 ounces
nickel sulphate
2 ounces ammonia chloride
3 ounces boric acid
24 ounces sodium sulphate
1 gallon water
pH from 5.9 to 6.1, temperature 80 degrees Fahrenheit.
We clean steel
parts in washing machine, cyanide copperplate, nickel plate, acid copper
plate, copper buff, nickel plate again and nickel
buff.
All told we get
about eight ten-thousandths of an inch of metal on our steel parts,
not counting the chromium.
In plating aluminum,
though we do very little work on aluminum, we follow Dr. Work’s method.
All our metal
parts are plated on plating hooks under spring tension and operators
on the racking of the parts all wear
rubber gloves so as
not to touch the buffed parts with their bare hands.
After nickel
plating the parts are nickel colored. We use care to get the best nickel
color
obtainable. The nickel buffers usually have two
wheels, one to cut down and one to color the nickel. By this method,
they get a very good color on the nickel. It also helps in the final
cleaning of the nickel buffed parts.
When we first
started cleaning nickel plated parts for chromium plating I never realized
how much trouble there
was in it. I do not believe there
was a cleaning expert in the country that I did not consult about the
problem of cleaning nickel before chromium plating. Everyone of them
failed me. On a visit to Chicago I had a long talk with our old friend,
Dad Liscomp, whom you all know. He advanced a theory to me. He said, ”Why
not try cyanide in the cleaner?”
When I got back
to Detroit, I tried cyanide and, believe me, we had some fun! Things
were worse than
ever. But the fact that I had faith in Dad
Liscomp got me to thinking and I tried cyanide alone, cyanide with
the cleaner in different strengths and cyanide after cleaning. It went
from
bad to worse. In despair I tried cyanide cleaner water rinse and alkaline
cleaner. The results were very favorable. At the present time I am
using the following lineup with success:
1 gallon water
4 ounces sodium cyanide
2 ounces caustic soda
The temperature
should be 200 degrees Fahrenheit, 7 volts pressure, cleaning time:
2 seconds, water
rinse, then into a cleaner of soda ash trisodium
phosphate and caustic soda and silicate of soda. This cleaner does
not contain any rosenate or soaps of any kind. The temperature of this
cleaner
must be thermostatically controlled or else there will be many failures.
From this point on the following cycle of rinses is recommended: water
rinse, acid dip consisting of muriatic acid and water, the strength
of the acid should be from 8 to 9 beaume on the hydrometer, water rinse,
cyanide dip with 14 beaume on the hydrometer, water spray, and chromium
acid bath for chromium plating. At this point, many of you will ask, ”Why
clean the nickel for chromium plating?” I consider it the best
thing to do and think it ought to be done whenever a finish of high quality
is required.
But, gentlemen,
I will try to explain with these slides, that I am going to show here,
that chromium plating can be done without
cleaning and
that it is sometimes necessary to chromium plate without cleaning. Cleaning
may interfere with the chromium plating.
For instance
we have four chromium solutions of 1200 gallons each. Each of them
is operated with a different
ratio of sulphate content.
We try
to maintain the same chromic acid content in all of the solutions.
CHROMIUM
TANK NO. 1 |
Date |
Content of H2SO4 |
Density of CrO3 |
Oz. per gal.
CrO3 |
Ratio of CrO3 to H2SO4 |
Sept. 14 |
.30 |
24.17 |
38.06 |
126 |
Sept. 21 |
.32 |
23.15 |
36.04 |
112 |
Sept. 29 |
.31 |
23.15 |
36.04 |
116 |
Nov. 6 |
.33 |
23.15 |
36.04 |
109 |
Nov. 13 |
.30 |
23.15 |
36.04 |
126 |
Nov. 20 |
.28 |
23.15 |
36.04 |
128 |
Nov. 27 |
.34 |
26.15 |
42.03 |
123 |
Dec. 4 |
.24 |
23.15 |
36.04 |
150 |
Tank
No. 1 would give a very good chromium deposit from ratio 112 to
130, above. 130 it would plate cloudy and rough, below 110 it has
no throwing power. |
CHROMIUM
TANK NO. 2 |
Date |
Content
of H2SO4 |
Density
of CrO3 |
Oz.
per gal. CrO3 |
Ratio
of CrO3 to H2SO4 |
Sept. 14 |
.24 |
23.15 |
36.4 |
150 |
Sept. 21 |
.32 |
23.15 |
36.4 |
113 |
Sept. 29 |
.31 |
23.15 |
36.4 |
117 |
Nov. 6 |
.33 |
24.17 |
38.6 |
116 |
Nov. 13 |
.34 |
26.15 |
42.3 |
124 |
Nov. 20 |
.32 |
26.15 |
42.3 |
132 |
Nov. 27 |
.42 |
25.17 |
40.3 |
95 |
Dec. 4 |
.32 |
25.17 |
40.3 |
125 |
Head
Lamp Bodies. |
CHROMIUM
TANK NO. 3 |
Date |
Content
of H2SO4 |
Density
of CrO3 |
Oz.
per gal. CrO3 |
Ratio
of CrO3 to H2SO4 |
Sept. 14 |
.30 |
22.12 |
34.4 |
113 |
Sept. 21 |
.32 |
22.12 |
34.4 |
107 |
Sept. 29 |
.29 |
22.12 |
34.4 |
118 |
Nov. 6 |
.26 |
24.17 |
38.6 |
147 |
Nov. 13 |
.31 |
24.17 |
38.6 |
124 |
Nov. 20 |
.30 |
22.12 |
34.4 |
114 |
Nov. 27 |
.30 |
22.12 |
34.4 |
114 |
Dec. 4 |
.30 |
22.12 |
34.4 |
114 |
Small
Side Lamps. |
CHROMIUM
TANK NO. 4 |
Date |
Content
of H2SO4 |
Density
of CrO3 |
Oz.
per gal. CrO3 |
Ratio
of CrO3 to H2SO4 |
Sept. 14 |
.41 |
24.17 |
38.6 |
94 |
Sept. 21 |
.40 |
23.15 |
36.4 |
91 |
Sept. 29 |
.47 |
23.15 |
36.4 |
77 |
Nov. 6 |
.46 |
25.17 |
40.3 |
87 |
Nov. 13 |
.62 |
27.11 |
44.2 |
71 |
Nov. 20 |
.52 |
25.17 |
40.3 |
77 |
Nov. 27 |
.52 |
25.17 |
40.3 |
77 |
Dec. 4 |
.47 |
23.15 |
36.4 |
77 |
H2SO4 is kept very high as we plate parts in this solution that we can
not clean.
12 volts are
used for this solution. |
In noting the
many valuable properties which chrome plate possesses many harbor the
impression that the finish
as applied to decorative parts
will even withstand the diamond scratch test.
This belief is
erroneous, for when we consider the thickness of chromium as applied
for instance
over our highly buffed nickel plated parts, such
as head lamps, as being only .00002, it will be clearly seen that the
plating may be scratched with an ordinary steel pin.
However, chrome
deposits may be plated sufficiently hard to resist the action of a
file or of
machining by plating to the thickness of .001
or more. It has been found that the degrees of hardness on various
thicknesses of chrome plate as compared with heat treated steels may
be obtained
by a scratch test using a sapphire jewel and then measuring the width
of the scratch in microns a few examples may be illustrated at this
point:
|
Width of scratch,
in microns |
1—Chrome
deposit .01968 Plated on |
2.09 |
2—Chrome
deposit .00669 base metal |
2.00 |
3—Chrome
deposit .00047 Deposited on hard steel |
1.68 |
4—Hardened
high carbon chrome steel |
2.30 |
5—Hardened
nitrallo steel |
2.03 |
6—Cyanide
steel |
2.60 |
7—Electro-deposited
nickel |
3.74 |
So it will be
noted from these figures illustrated that the hardness of the base
metal upon which- the
chromium is deposited plays quite an
important part. Many of the factory plug gauges are salvaged by chrome
plating directly over the hardened steel from an economical standpoint
as the gauges when treated in this manner will give from 10 to 20 times
the service of ordinary hardened steel. So much for hard chrome plate.
Let
us revert for a moment on chrome plating as used on decorative parts
and its future. This paper would be incomplete at this time if mention
was not made of the use of stainless steel as a substitute for chrome
plate finishes. Many of you, no doubt, know that automobile manufacturers
have already released for production stainless steel for such parts
as hood top hinges and body mouldings displacing the brass base nickel-chrome
plate finish. The properties of stainless steel are very similar to
chrome
plate largely due to the presence of a high percentage of chromium
which is incorporated into the steel at the time of manufacture. In
order to
produce a surface on stainless steel which will resist corrosion and
the weather elements it is absolutely necessary that the metal be polished
carefully, as small particles of scale on the surface of chromium will
induce a difference of potential which results in pitting. The difference
in appearance of a highly polished piece of stainless steel as compared
with chrome plate is very small, and would not be noticed by the average
layman. The chief reason for the enthusiasm displayed for stainless
steel at this time, it is believed to be due to the fact that the steel
companies
manufacturing this wonderful non-corrosive metal have increased their
production the past three years, which has resulted in a price reduction
of approximately forty per cent, making it attractive for the engineers
to consider in it price competition with chromium plating as there
will be no necessity to plate stainless steel.
It may
be interesting at this time to make mention that the new Chrysler office
building
is being equipped
quite extensively with stainless steel.
The lofty tower, a large portion of the exterior architectural metal
decoration, store fronts and casement windows of the lower floor, and
for interior ornamental metal work. These points are mentioned here
merely to show the interest awakened in stainless steel the past six
months.
There are other decorative automotive parts where the use of stainless
steels at the present time would be prohibitive, such as bumper bars,
head lamp tie rods and radiator shells. This is due to factors such
as too high a scrap loss, difficulties in fabrication and polishing
costs,
although automatic polishing machines have been designed lately to
take care of some of the high cost of polishing this material.
Summarizing
what has been said and done on chromium plating its future will depend
on the type of work furnished by those engaged in the art
and the cost in producing a finish in competition with some of the
newer metals which have been developed and introduced to the metal
trade.
REPORT
OF ELECTROPLATING CONFERENCE
HELD AT ROCHESTER, N.Y., MARCH 22, 1930
For several years
conferences on electroplating problems have been held under the auspices
of the American
Electroplaters’ Society and
the Bureau of Standards. These were held in Washington until 1929, when
the meeting was held in Newark. This year the conference was held in
Rochester, N. Y., and was well attended.
A—Sylvester
Gartland Presiding
The first session
was devoted to industrial plating problems.
1. Automobiles.—W.
M. Phillips of the General Motors Corporation, reported that, partly
as a result of the competition with stainless steel,
the total thickness of copper and nickel plated on steel prior to chromium
plating had been materially increased, and is now usually from 0.0008
inch to 0.001 inch. An increase in the present thickness of chromium
(about 0.00003 inch) is not advantageous. It would be better still to
increase the total thickness of copper and nickel to about 0.002 inch.
The cost of steel with such coatings is much less than that of stainless
steel. In nickel deposition at high temperatures and current densities,
a very low pH, for example from 1 to 3, gives a wider range for good
deposits. The solutions with a pH of 3 or less are practically free from
suspended matter. Initial pitting can be overcome with hydrogen peroxide.
A plea was made for a better quality of steel. One cause of failures
of chromium plating on automobiles, is the use of calcium chloride for
snow and ice removal. It is more corrosive than sodium chloride, as it
is not only hydroscopic and stays wet, but it also dydrolyzes to liberate
hydrochloric acid.
2. Aircraft.—M. R. Whitmore, of the U. S. Air
Corps, at Dayton, stated that on steel aircraft parts, either 0.001 inch
of zinc or 0.00(3
inch of cadmium is used. The cadmium is especially good for dimensioned
and threaded parts and for marine exposure.
On aluminum alloys
plating has not been extensively applied The oxide films, such as are
produced
by anodic treatment in dilute chromic acid,
are especially valuable for holding films of grease or lacquer,’ which
protect against corrosion. The oxide films may also be dyed. Aluminum
castings may be protected by dipping in 25 per cent sodium silicate solution,
and then baking for 30 minutes. ”Alclad” metal consists of
duralumin, coated with a layer of pure aluminum, applied by rolling.
It is only available in sheets.
The speaker concluded
that more work should be done on the relation of accelerated tests,
such as the salt spray
and intermittent immersion,
to the actual protective value of zinc and cadmium; and on the factors
that affect the value of the aluminum oxide coatings.
3. Hardware.—R.
E. Hicks, of Yale and Towne Manufacturing Company, stated that they have
practically overcome stain spotting by allowing
the plated articles to stand a few days before finishing and lacquering.
The porosity has also been decreased by changes in the patterns. In the
discussion, the use of burnishing instead of bung was suggested as a
means of closing the pores.
Crystal spots
are now infrequent, as sulphur is excluded by an oil film. There is
also less danger of sulphur gases
in the holds of oil-burning
steamships than in the coal-burning vessels.
For nickel plating
on die castings, satisfactory results are obtained with solutions containing
sodium sulphate. Chromium has proven valuable
to increase the life of taps and dies used for cutting non-ferrous
metals.
A
reference to the cleaning of metals led to an interesting discussion
regarding the removal of grease and buffing materials. Cleaning with
oil or turpentine at 250 degrees Fahrenheit was mentioned; and also
the application of ”red oil” to facilitate removal of kerosene
or similar oils in the alkaline cleaners. ”Vapor cleaning,” by
condensing vapors of liquids, such as trichlorethylene on the metal surfaces,
was also described.
4. Silverware.—F.
C. Mesle, of the Oneida Community, described the methods used for plating
18 per cent nickel silver. He
pointed out
that the following problems are in heed of study. (a) Better and more
rapid cleaning methods. (b) A means of controlling the carbon bisulphide
content of ”bright” solutions, and an explanation of its
effects. (c) Control and measurement of metal distribution. (d) Control
and measurement of hardness of the deposits. (e) The irregular corrosion
of silver anodes. (f) The comparative value of sodium and potassium
cyanides. (g) The effects of carbonates and other salts.
A discussion
of ”non-tarnishing” silver included the addition
to the silver of cadmium, zinc, gold, and platinum. A cathodic treatment
in dilute chromic acid was reported to retard the tarnishing.
B—G.
B. Hogaboom Presiding
In the session
devoted to reports from research laboratories, the following subjects
were discussed:
5. Researches
at the Bureau of Standards.—W.
Blum summarized the work in progress, including (a) the protective value
of chromium plating,
(b) pH measurements with a glass electrode, and (c) miscellaneous activities
of the section. Owing to several resignations, the research work, both
by the Bureau staff and by Research Associates, has been seriously interrupted.
Steps are being taken to fill the vacancies and to continue the researches.
6.
Analysis of Silver Plating Solutions.—R. M. Wick, of the Bureau
of Standards, reported the results of a study of methods of determining
(a) free cyanide, (b) total cyanide, (c) silver, (d) carbonate, and (e)
chloride in silver plating baths. In each case the methods were studied
with respect to their value for research work and for plant control.
It is hoped to publish the details of the methods in the near future.
7.
Plating on Zinc and Die Castings.—E. A. Anderson of the New
Jersey Zinc Company, discussed the methods of plating nickel on zinc
and zinc base die-castings. The use of chlorine was suggested to coagulate
grease suspended in the alkaline electrolytic cleaner. Dipping in 1 per
cent hydrofluoric acid just before plating was found to promote good
adhesion of the nickel. The latter is usually deposited from high sulphate
baths.
Nickel and chromium
can be stripped from zinc by a reverse current in concentrated sulphuric
acid containing a small amount of glycerine.
Chromium
can be plated directly on zinc die castings, but only in a dull form.
When this is buffed, it furnishes excellent protection against corrosion,
and is now used commercially.
The outstanding
problems are (a) improved methods of cleaning, and (b) the production
of softer nickel deposits
with a thickness of about 0.0004
inch.
8. Deposition
of Zinc-Cadmium Alloys.—C. J. Wernlund, of the
Roessler and Hasslacher Company, described in detail the production
of deposits
containing from 10 to 15 per cent of cadmium and the balance of zinc.
The cadmium serves as a brightener, and produces coatings which are
harder than either zinc or cadmium, and which yields nearly as good
protection
in the salt spray as pure cadmium.
The
deposits are made from ”high
alkali” zinc cyanide solutions,
to which a small amount of cadmium oxide is added. The anodes consist
of an alloy of zinc and cadmium in about the proportions desired in
the deposit. The composition of the deposit is affected by the bath
composition,
including the content of free alkali, the temperature and the cathode
current density.
9. Plating
Researches in American Universities.—A
report, compiled by W. Blum, showed that researches on electroplating
have recently been
conducted, or are now in progress in at least fourteen institutions,
including Brown University, Columbia University, Cornell University,
University of Indiana, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University
of Michigan, University of Minnesota, College of the City of New York,
University of Pennsylvania, University of Pittsburgh (Mellon Institute),
University of Toronto, Vanderbilt University, Washington University,
and the University of Wisconsin. Through such researches, many of the
problems of plating are being solved.
TO MEMBERSHIP
OF A. E. S.
This is answer
to an inquiry from Mr. Edwin S. Gray, member of Pittsburgh Branch to
the United States Public Health
Service at Washington, D. C.,
on cyanide poisoning.
Mr. Gray has
been in bed for eight months under treatment by physicians and felt
that by publishing this reply to his
inquiry he might help some
member of the society and also caution members who work in cyanide
solutions and do not use utmost care. He is a silver plater and was
in contact
with lots of cyanide.
They state that
with regard to electroplating that the chief element of danger is in
the use of a solution of potassium
of cyanide. The fumes
of which are breathed by the worker. The symptoms of acute poisoning
are those of vertigo, headache, rush of blood to the head. appression
of the chest, palpitation of the heart, a sensation of constriction
around the throat with dryness, nausea and vomiting, and gasping respiration.
To the stage of dysphnoea succeeds that of spasm with cold, perspiring
skin, convulsions and involuntary micturition with loss of consciousness.
In the stage of asphyxiation there is temporary suspension of respiration,
retardation of heart action, delation of the pupils of eye, loss of
consciousness,
inspirations, cyanoses of the skin and mucous membranes, collapse,
death.
Total of twenty-six symptoms in cyanide poisoning.
MR.
E.S. GRAY, Pittsburgh Branch.
PROGRESS AND
BENEFITS OF STANDARDS
Read at First
Annual Meeting Los Angeles Branch, March 15, 1930,
by F. A. Maurer,
B. S., Chemist at Edison Elec. App.
Co., Ontario,
Cal.
A standard
is a criterion of excellence—since early times man has
struggled for some definite standard by which he may measure the fruit
of his labors. In some lines of endeavor it has been very easy to set
up standards. Definite weights may be taken or measurements made, or
a definite count taken: It has always been exceedingly difficult to measure
the quality of plating, however, because there has been no tangible basis
of measurement. On account of the difficulty of measurement the plating
industry has been backward about setting up standards. Now, however,
there is insistent demand from purchasers of plate for definite guarantees
of performance. The purchaser is demanding that he be shown the comparative
value of the plate he is buying.
A great deal
of research work has been done on testing the quality of nickel plate,
copper plate and zinc plate
in response to this demand.
Also methods of insuring an absolutely uniform deposit of metal on
each piece are being devised.
A few years ago
standards in the plating industry were unheard of. Each shop put its
plate on its own way. There was no
universal method of specifying
a plating job. As a result there was the greatest kind of confusion.
The axiom, ”let the buyer beware,” prevailed. No definite
guarantees were made, in fact none could be made. As the situation with
respect to plate, so the situation with respect to plating supplies. Each
plater had his own favorite grade or brand of each of the materials
he used.
In line
with the insistent demand from purchasers for quality standards to
base their purchases upon, this situation has greatly
altered. We
believe it has altered for the better. We believe it has caused the
production of better plating supplies, and we believe it has caused
the production
of a better quality of plate.
A few years ago,
how often was the salesman asked about the composition of his supplies,
how often was the purchasing
agent interested in anything
but the price ? Probably seldom did he consider what effect the purity
of chemicals would have on the ultimate cost. Usually he wanted to
pay out the least per pound—and single nickel salts were only single
nickel salts with very little interest shown in them except the price.
Now,
however, man demands a standard of excellence in the plate he buys.
Since the plater must knuckle down and meet certain specifications
as
to thickness of plate, luster, and ability to withstand corrosion,
he has had to intensively study his methods of producing the plate,
and
he has had to make a study of the properties of his plating supplies.
He has demanded better plating equipment from his supplier and he has
demanded better plating chemicals.
The more intelligent
platers of the country have long since learned the value of swapping
ideas. When two
men exchange dollars they each have
one, but when they exchange ideas, each has two. Through the medium
of the Electro Platers’ Society money was made available for research
work in plating at the Bureau of Standards. This work has been the means
of arousing a great deal of interest in better plating methods. Rapidly
we are dispersing the great thick blanket of mystery and secrecy which
formerly permeated the plating industry. We are now opening up the industry
to investigation and research. As a consequence we are getting results
never before dreamed of. An illustration of what I mean may be seen in
the extremely short time it has taken us to get into large scale production
of high quality chromium plating. It was only accomplished because results
were widely published, and the interest of the whole country concentrated
on the subject.
Some time ago
Blum and Hogaboom in their authoritative work, ”Principles
of Electroplating,” stated ”There is today no greater need
in the plating industry than the development of reliable specifications
and methods of testing the products.” A yardstick has most certainly
been needed. We ought to know the thickness of the coat, the evenness
of distribution, its resistance to corrosion, the degree of adhesion
to the base metal, the porosity, and the hardness.
The literature
has contained many helpful articles on methods of determining and setting
up standards for these variable factors in plating. Prof.
Baker has published a system of rating results from Salt Spray tests.
Blum and Thomas, Karl Pitschner and N. J. Gebert have published good
work on the ferroxyl method for testing porosity of nickel and copper
plates. A method has been devised for controlling the thickness of
plate
from an acid copper sulfate bath. (”Metal Industry,” Vol.
27, No. 10, p. 478.)
With so much
interest displayed in the subject, I think it will not be far to the
day when there will be several standard
grades of plating
produced in the industry, which can be bought on specification and
test. The bringing about of this result cannot fail to be helpful to
buyer
and seller alike.
In our own plants
we endeavor to keep up with the latest developments in plating. We
have set up in all about twelve standard
grades of nickel
plated finishes, from the finest finish obtainable for high grade table
appliances to the lowest finish, for rust proofing only in parts ordinarily
not visible. Each finish differs very slightly from every other one,
either in thickness of plate, in method of preparing the surface, or
applying the plate, or buffing. We have four or five separate and distinct
nickel plating processes. Each process differs in some respect from
any of the others. One may be intended for a bright plate, another
for a
heavy plate for protection against oxidation at high temperatures,
another to give a rapid plating time, and another for parts of odd
shape.
The
variable factors in a process are as closely controlled as is consistent
with good practice. These factors may be current density, voltage,
chemical composition of the plating solution and the anodes, temperature,
time
for plating, and acidity. We have instruments which give us current
density, voltage, temp. and time.
Chemical analyses
of the solutions are made at frequent intervals, and the pH or acidity
of the solution is very carefully
maintained at the
correct figure. Chemicals are added when analysis shows they are needed.
We
also maintain a control over our plating chemicals. These are carefully
examined before use, and are bought on definite specifications as to
purity. Certain small amounts of impurities in the chemicals can be
very harmful whereas in other cases a small amount of impurity may
be of no
consequence, or may be positively beneficial.
After the plate
has been applied and buffed our work is not yet done. We must test
the plate for
adherence, porosity, evenness of distribution,
resistance to weather conditions and thickness. If our previous work
has been carefully done the plate will pass the final test satisfactorily.
If certain precautions have been overlooked, the plate may not be satisfactory.
In that event, search is made until the incorrect condition is determined
and remedied. In some cases the fault of poor plate has been found
to lie not in the plating room, but in some step in the process beyond
control
of the plating foreman. A general control must therefore be maintained
over all materials used and over all processes, so that for example,
steel suitable for electroplating is used in press work, and cast iron,
which is dense, fine grained and free of pores is produced in the foundry.
A
control program as outlined above involves considerable expense and
time, but is the only practical way to obtain a large volume of high
grade plate at reasonable cost. Money so spent should be regarded not
as an expense but as an investment, which will yield very handsomely.
LOS
ANGELES BRANCH PRESENT AND FUTURE
Read at First
Annual Banquet, March 15, 1930, by M. D. Rynkofs, Secretary
For
your information, I would like to call your attention to the fact that
this assembly
is the largest
group of men interested in Electroplating
ever congregated on the Pacific Coast at one time.
The
purpose of this branch in having become affiliated with the American
Electro-platers’ Society
readily visible here today, is to improve our knowledge of plating
and its research possibilities.
We consider
this achievement (I call it an achievement because the platers in L.
A.
have tried to organize themselves for the past number of years
with but very little or no success), very essential to the Electroplating
Industry, particularly on this coast. And so we have one thing in view
and that is ”A Society for the Advancement of the Science of
Electroplating.”
The
research work in Electroplating not only is carried on here in Los
Angeles, but in the entire United States, Canada and England. ”Research” is
a word that is no longer a private or ”Highbrow” term. Research
is now understood by most everyone, from the plater’s helper
to the president of the company, and in no industry is research more
highly
regarded than in Electroplating.
The initial research
work is always something of a gamble. We must devote efforts to groping
in the dark. We must spend
money in driving tunnels
through mountains in the hope that we will find the treasure of new
facts or truths which will make our work clearer, less difficult, less
costly
and more valuable.
The Electroplating
Industry is now confronted as never before with the need of true facts.
Twenty years ago nobody cared much
how deposition
of metal was performed commercially, because a Plater was a Plater,
and a Plate was a Plate and that was all there was to it. Now we know
that
a Plater should be a solution analyst and a Plate should not only he
bright but it must be heavy, uniform, corrosion-resistant and economical.
The public is awake to the beauty and utility of the fine Electroplated
finish and is making demands which this trade must satisfy.
Electroplating
as an industry, has grown apace and is still growing at a faster rate
than ever before. It cannot continue without a firm foundation
of new facts, improved methods and processes and improved results.
How are these to be obtained? By guesswork? By sporadic individual
efforts
here and there? By accidents and stumbling over new devices ? We say
that where such weak methods aid us, we are glad to accept their help.
But we cannot build a great industry upon them. We must have solid,
well laid plans in the hands of responsible, trained and intelligent
leaders.
Therefore
the most important development in this industry on the Pacific Coast
was the affiliation of the Platers with the American Electroplater’s
Society. A well balanced industrial development requires both new participants
and expansion of those already operating. When I say this development
requires new participants, I mean that we welcome all qualified platers
on the Coast, particularly in this vicinity. And for the benefit of
you who wish to join this branch, I suggest they fill out their application
today and save the initiation fee increase, which will become effective
April 1.
The next most
important development is the Chemistry class of the Los Angeles Branch,
which is being administered by this branch in
co-operation
with the Board of Education. This class had its initial session less
than a month ago when 37 men responded and has been gradually increasing
in such proportions that the School Board will be forced to make preparations
to start another class.
Remember
the Los Angeles Branch, still in its infancy, is being commented upon
for
its progress by the entire plating
industry in the country.
The Supreme Secretary made the following comment: ”I want to
compliment the Los Angeles Branch and all its officers for the good
work accomplished
so far by your branch. You all deserve great credit for the same and
your work and enthusiasm has been wonderful and far greater than that
of a great many of the branches east of the Rockies, so keep it up
and by this time next year Los Angeles will be pushing some of the
larger
branches aside and taking their place.”
Our Supreme President wrote a few days ago and he said: ”From
the reports I have on hand and read in the Review and Metal Industry,
you
sure have some live branch, and allow me at this time to congratulate
you on the wonderful start you have made.”
It is
true—we did
make a pretty good start.
The
Supreme Secretary says something about pushing some of the larger branches
aside and
taking their place. For that remark we have pushed
aside some twenty branches, Los Angeles standing in fifth place in
membership, exceeded only by Chicago, Philadelphia, New York and Newark.
It will
be recalled that at our Smoker Meeting last October, this position
was predicted for Los Angeles and is now realized. But why stop at
fifth
place? Why not make it second place? It is possible, but it’s
up to each one of you to help keep it up as near the top as possible.
It
may interest you to know that there are over 100 more Platers who will
qualify right here in Los Angeles, not to speak of a possible invasion
of other cities in this vicinity.
I may also call
to your attention that at our monthly meeting held Wednesday evening
this branch elected 18
new members to its fold. This is a distinct
honor for the Los Angeles Chapter and I have learned we have set a
record in electing the 18 members or the largest group ever known to
be admitted
to any branch after the branch had been established.
|