The names of ”Blum
and Hogaboom” have been so closely associated
through our joint textbook that the title of the book has become secondary.
It is therefore appropriate that at this time I should recall and recount
some of my personal contacts with George Hogaboom, especially as many of
these are
so intimately connected with the history of the American Electroplaters’ Society.
I
first met George Hogaboom at the third AES convention, held at Dayton,
Ohio, in 1915. It was then obvious to me, a newcomer in the electroplating
field,
that he dominated many of the plans and activities of the AES, of which
he
was the first president. He welcomed me into the field and immediately
started to discuss how the National Bureau of Standards could join in the
aims of
the Society.
The next occasion for our
intimate association was in 1918, when he and others from the plating industry
were invited to a conference
on military
applications
of electroplating. Soon thereafter he was appointed as “Electroplating
Advisor” to the National Bureau ‘of Standards. Together with
Fred (Dad) Liscomb, and Tom Slattery, he brought to us scientists a grasp
of practical
plating which would otherwise have taken many years to acquire. During
this period Hogaboom, Liscomb and Slattery lived in our home, so we talked
electroplating
most of our waking hours!
In 1920 I was requested
to write a book on electroplating, and, recognizing the need for presenting
both the practical and theoretical
sides, I asked
George Hogaboom to be a coauthor. At first he demurred, probably because
he was not
yet convinced that a scientist could contribute much to this field.
After further consideration he agreed and in 1924 the first edition of Blum
and Hogaboom
appeared. The practical information and formulas supplied by him were
especially valuable in this edition, because otherwise I might have
found
myself explaining
processes that did not exist!
During the interval between
World Wars I and II, George Hogaboom was active in connection with NBS plating
researches,
first as a member
of an advisory
committee and later of the AES Research Committee, of which he was
chairman for one year. During this period he constantly brought up
new problems
for research, some of which were then, and still are, beyond the
scope of existing
knowledge and methods. His views at times seemed contradictory, because
on the one hand he wanted research to be expedited to meet immediate
needs, and on the other hand he demanded that every research should
be complete
and conclusive.
During World War II he
was associated with the War Production Board, with special reference to the
conservation of metals such
as copper
and nickel,
and the
development of substitutes for these metals in plated coatings
on both military and civilian supplies. I sat in with him and others
in many
conferences on
this subject. Just as with the nickel shortage of the last few
years, he was very critical of substitutes that he felt were unsatisfactory
and not
creditable
to the plating industry.
A Eulogy on George B. Hogaboom
By Royal
F. Clarke, Sr.
In a very real sense, George Hogaboom
was a perfectionist, and hence was critical of all researches and results
that fell short of perfection
(as
all must).
Even when others, including myself, felt that some of his criticisms-were
unwarranted, close scrutiny usually showed that improvements were possible
in the report
or
the method, though not necessarily, in the way suggested by him. At one
of the Research Committee meetings, in his presence, I stated that “I
am always glad to hear George Hogaboom’s criticisms, for I am sure
that he will think of everything that any one would suggest, hence. I need
not worry about criticisms
from others.” Such a person with the determination to fight for his
views serves a very useful purpose in any field such as plating, because
he forces
people to re-examine their assumptions and conclusions, and thus frequently
brings about definite improvements.
George Hogaboom represented in the
best sense a combination of a vast fund of practical experience and as much
science as a person can acquire without
the
opportunity for a formal scientific education. In recent years he regretted
his inability to fully understand the mathematics and advanced physics
and chemistry
that are now involved in many researches in electrodeposition. I assured
him sincerely that he should not worry about that limitation, as most
scientists
have difficulty in understanding and using the results of the revolutionary
researches
of the last twenty-five years.
Electroplating was the very life
of George Hogaboom and the AES was its living symbol. Even though he was
a member of
the Electrochemical Society
and the
ASTM, he was very jealous lest these bodies usurp any of the prerogatives
of the AES,
a fear that I am sure was unfounded. He was a zealot and a crusader
for advancement in our knowledge of plating. Through his persistence he awakened
many of
us from our complacency or even apathy regarding progress. His life
work
built a bridge
between the art and the science of electroplating, the influence of
which will be felt for generations. He was literally a pioneer in this difficult
and important
field. ID his last letter to me he regretted, in fact resented, his
inability
to continue the strenuous activities that he had conducted for over
sixty years.
His work is finished, it is our
task to complete it.
As a personal friend of George Hogaboom
for 44 years, I feel it my duty to eulogize him. It was at the first meeting
of electroplaters
at the
Broadway Central Hotel
in February 1909, prior to the formation of the old National Electroplaters’ Association
of the U. S. and Canada, that I first met George Hogaboom. Our
friendship has continued until his death on December 31, 1953.
During those
44 years, we had
corresponded often after we both had left Newark and exchanged
Christmas cards yearly. I received his last card on December 23,
1953.
George had a very extensive library
of books on electroplating. One he prized especially was on “Gold Plating” by
Roesleur and printed in French.
I recall that George had a tiny
hippocampus, a small fish which
swims upright and has a head and-foreparts horse like in form
(called a
sea horse by
Webster) George metallized it in copper then silver plated
it and used it as a watch
charm.
In 1916, George and I attended the
Bridgeport, Conn., banquet and took the midnight trolley to my home in East
Norwalk. That
night
it only
went to Westport.
Since
it was a beautiful moonlight night, we walked 3 miles to
my home and talked “plating” all
the way.
When George was employed in Newark,
in a plant where silver was deposited on glass articles such as perfume bottles,
small sugar
bowls and
cream pitchers, I was taken through the plating department.
I was shown wires
which were
wound
around the articles that had 36 to 48 hours of silver plate.
George tied a wire into a knot showing the softness of
the
silver deposit
and no
peeling occurred.
It was at this plant that windows were left open one night
when the winter temperature dropped to zero. Next morning,
George
noticed that crystals
were adhering to
the sides of the silver plating tanks and on the bottom.
He siphoned the silver
electrolyte and shoveled the precipitate out and had the
crystals analyzed by our honorary member, Dr. Joseph W.
Richards, Professor
at Lehigh
University, who reported the crystals were carbonates.
That was, I believe, the beginning
of ”freezing out of carbonates” from cyanide
plating electrolytes. George told me that after the freezing
he discovered that he did not need to
add as much free cyanide as formerly.
George gave freely
of his knowledge on the deposition of metals. His passing
will be missed by the entire membership
of the
American Electroplaters’ Society.
George and I were,
until his untimely death, the only two platers living
that attended the first meeting in
1909,
prior-to the
formation of
the American Electroplaters’ Society.