Historical Articles
June, 1954 issue of Plating
QUESTION BOX
The following
series of questions and answers, submitted by Eugene Roth, Secretary-Treasurer
of the St. Joseph Valley Branch, were taken from a panel discussion at a
recent meeting of that branch. The answers to the questions were provided
by a panel
of experts composed as follows: Joe Haviland, Frank Savage, Harold Weisner,
and
Duke Wysong as moderator.
Q. What is the comparison
of adhesion between copper strike or nickel strike
on steel?
A. (By Panel) On clean
steel, copper is not necessary; on impure steel, copper strike will help.
Q.
What are the advantages of high-chloride nickel strike?
A. (By Panel) It
may give somewhat better coverage in low-current density areas, such as
recesses; otherwise, there is no outstanding advantage,
and it does make
the plating problem more complex.
Q. What troubles are likely
to occur in chromium plating 430 stainless steel?
A. (By Panel) There is
no unusual plating problem. The main difficulty may be that the stainless
steel
may not be of uniform composition
which will
require
polishing and buffing before plating. Chromium will be only as
good as the quality of the finish over which you plate.
Q. We nickel plated
very close mesh monel metal screens and found nickel peeling when the screen
was rolled under pressure. What
precautions can we take?
A. (By Panel) The cause
of the trouble most likely is internal stress in the nickel deposit. The
remedy may be heating
after
plating either
in an
oven or
by a long soak in hot water.
Q. Does the panel
know what the ”Morley
Process” of hard chromium
plating is?
A. (By Panel) No one present
has heard of this process name.
Q. Has the panel heard
of a process specification for nonreflective chromium plating for Army-Navy
jobs?
A. (By Panel) No written
specifications are known off-hand, but cold plating or a different type chromium
bath may
give the dull
results
that are desired.
Q. Does a coating of 0.0002
inch copper plus 0.0005 inch nickel give a completely rust resistant coverage
on steel
washing
machine parts?
A. (By Panel) Depends a
great deal on the steel. Ordinarily, the plating thickness for this purpose
would be a minimum
of 0.001
inch. Also,
copper is being considered
less and less for corrosion resistance while a
nickel
deposit, without copper, direct on good grade steel
will give as
good or better corrosion
resistance.
Q. We have a ”fish-scale” pitting
on 0.040 inch thick hard chromium plated shafts
in the high-current density area. What causes
this?
A. (By Panel) Most likely
low sulfate.
Q. We used a portable barrel
to cadmium plate steel screws and instead of their being plated
with cadmium
we found
a severe etching of screws
to a
degree where
it reduced the screw dimensions. Polarity
was right and the following
barrel plated work was fine.
A. (By Panel)
Silence. (Brother you have something there.)
Q. We have a blackening
job to do on cadmium plated parts, and we are using a proprietary
dip but can’t get uniform black.
A.
(By Panel) A muriatic acid dip before
blackening may help. Heating the black
dip above operating
temperature and then
cooling it may
help restore
the blackening
dip quality; preheating the work to
operating temperature of the bath may make color
more uniform.
Q. We have zinc die castings
which show streaks after a copper strike;
streaks
do not show
up when plated
in regular
copper
plating tank.
A (By Panel) If it looks
like glove marks, a change of polishing compound
may help—or use lime on polisher’s
gloves, or alcohol to wipe pieces;
or, if it is plating trouble, correct
the copper strike solution. Actually,
not enough facts are known to make
any definite recommendations.
Q.
How is hard-chromium plating
done on aluminum?
A. (By Panel) Two ways—for light-work requirements
of parts, use sand blast on aluminum, then plate this will give fair chromium
adhesion. For severe
requirements,
use zincate process recommended
by Aluminum Co. of America with single, double, or even triple zincate cycles
to get best adhesion.