 |
 |
Historical Articles, October, 1949
A.E.S MEMBERSHIP COMPETITION (Plating, Oct. 1949)
|
Membership April 1, 1949 |
New Members |
Net Change in Membership |
Per Cent Net Change |
|
|
First Group |
||||
| Cleveland |
186 |
12 |
13 |
7.0 |
| Detroit |
427 |
34 |
29 |
6.8 |
| New York |
265 |
21 |
15 |
5.7 |
| Milwaukee |
132 |
6 |
4 |
3.0 |
| Chicago |
391 |
16 |
7.5 |
1.9 |
| Philadelphia |
187 |
6 |
3.5 |
1.9 |
| Pittsburgh |
135 |
9 |
1.5 |
1.1 |
| Bridgeport |
160 |
3 |
||
| Grand Rapids |
160 |
|||
| Hartford |
133 |
6 |
-10 |
-7.5 |
| Los Angeles |
217 |
9 |
-19.5 |
-9.0 |
| Toronto |
154 |
6 |
-17 |
-11.0 |
| Newark |
256 |
4 |
-34.5 |
-13.5 |
| Boston |
153 |
4 |
-37.5 |
-24.5 |
|
Second Group |
||||
| Melbourne |
81 |
10 |
8 |
9.9 |
| Buffalo |
82 |
6 |
7 |
8.5 |
| Sydney |
108 |
6 |
6 |
5.6 |
| Baltimore-Wash |
83 |
5 |
3.5 |
4.1 |
| Indianapolis |
104 |
5 |
3.5 |
3.4 |
| New Haven |
108 |
2 |
2 |
1.9 |
| Phov.-Attleboro |
109 |
3 |
1.5 |
1.3 |
| Waterbury. |
122 |
3 |
||
| Cincinnati |
90 |
|||
| St. Louis |
107 |
7 |
-.5 |
-.5 |
| St. Joseph Valley. |
80 |
-1 |
-1.2 |
|
| Syracuse |
83 |
2 |
-3.5 |
-4.2 |
| Rochester |
125 |
-10.5 |
-8.4 |
|
| Dayton |
98 |
2 |
-9.5 |
-9.7 |
|
Third Group |
||||
| Columbus |
38 |
3 |
2.5 |
6.6 |
| Springfield |
50 |
2 |
2 |
4.0 |
| Southeastern |
38 |
7 |
1.5 |
3.9 |
| Saginaw Valley |
67 |
2 |
2 |
3.0 |
| Toledo |
56 |
1 |
1.5 |
2.7 |
| Louisville |
20 |
2 |
0.5 |
2.5 |
| Lancaster |
59 |
1 |
||
| Twin City |
77 |
1 |
||
| Rockford |
56 |
|||
| Montreal |
69 |
3 |
-1.5 |
-2.2 |
| San Francisco |
71 |
10 |
-2 |
-2.8 |
| Jackson-Lansing |
59 |
-4.5 |
-7.6 |
|
| Adelaide |
76 |
4 |
-8 |
-10.5 |
| Allentown-Reading |
43 |
1 |
-10.5 |
-24.4 |
|
Outside Competition |
||||
| Hamilton |
14 |
+20 |
||
| Western Ontario |
15 |
+15 |
||
| At Large |
100 |
13 |
+8 |
|
| In Transfer |
22 |
+3 |
||
|
Total A. E. S |
5,237 |
266 |
-12 |
-.02 |
 |
 |
 |
The information contained in this site is provided for your review and convenience. It is not intended to provide legal advice with respect to any federal, state, or local regulation.
You should consult with legal counsel and appropriate authorities before interpreting any regulations or undertaking any specific course of action.
Please note that many of the regulatory discussions on STERC refer to federal regulations. In many cases, states or local governments have promulgated relevant rules and standards
that are different and/or more stringent than the federal regulations. Therefore, to assure full compliance, you should investigate and comply with all applicable federal, state and local regulations.