Historical Articles
September, 1952 issue of Plating
HARD CHROMIUM PLATE TO IMPROVE
THE CORROSION RESISTANCE OF TOOL STEEL
H. E. RICKS
Materials Engineering Department, Westinghouse Electric Corporation., East Pittsburgh,
Pa.
ABSTRACT
The corrosion protection offered by hard chromium plating was found to be proportional
to the thickness of the chromium plate and to the surface smoothness of the
panel before plating. For molds, it is recommended that the surface be given
a finish of 5 micro inches or less prior to plating and that the chromium plate
thickness be at least 0.0005 inch thick.
INTRODUCTION
For some time, controversy has existed as to the value of hard chromium plate
in improving the corrosion resistance of tool steels. Hard chromium plated molds
are generally accepted by the plastic molding trade as being superior to unplated
molds. The hard chromium plate is generally described as very hard wearing and
corrosion-resistant.
One of the commonly accepted reasons
for hard chromium plating plastic molds is to minimize wear and thus inease
the mold-life inasmuch as hard chromium plate has extreme hardness and a low
coefficient of friction. In addition, the chromium plate aids in maintaining
the desired surface finish on molded parts. Hard chromium plating also serves
as a valuable buildup tool for salvaging undersized mold parts due
to unpredicted growth during heat treatments, mistakes in machining, or normal
wear. A major cost reduction consideration in high volume, short cycle molding
operations is the excellent anti friction property of chromium plate which practically
eliminates down time caused by sticking induced by resin build-up.
The object of the work reported here
was to show }ow chromium plate affects the corrosion resistance of tool steel.
EXPERIMENTAL
Panels of tool steel were heat treated to a hardness of Rc 52-55 and were given
three different finishes: (1) medium sandblast, 150 micro inches, RMS average;
(2) original machined finish 25 micro inches, RMS average; (3) ground and buffed
finished 2 micro inches, RMS average.
The panels with the different surface
finishes were then divided into four groups; one group was left bare and the
other three groups were plated with different thicknesses of chromium, namely:
flash, 0.0005 inch and 0.001 inch. The following plating cycle was used:
1. Vapor degrease
2. Immersion soak in hot alkaline cleaner 30 seconds
3. Rinse thoroughly in cold water
4. Reverse etch 30 seconds at 6 volts in plating solution and plate at 2 nmp/sq
in (Temperature 131° F)*
5. Rinse thoroughly and air dry
---------------------
*The plating solution analyzed as follows: 27.4 oz/gal trivalent chromium
and 0.01 oz/gal iron.
DISCUSSION
Figs. 1 and 2 show that chromium plating definitely protects tool steel from
carbonated water and from 95 percent relative humidity.
The data were made from visual observation of the panels. Hence, if there appears
to be some discrepancy in correlating the tables with the figures, it is due
to the difficulty in obtaining realistic photographs.
CONCLUSIONS
1. Hard-chromium plate renders tool steel more corrosion resistant.
2. For a given thickness of chromium plate, greater protection is obtained on
a smooth surface than on a rough-surfaced basis metal.
3. For the thicknesses tested, the corrosion protection is directly proportional
to the thickness of chromium plate.
RECOMMENDATION
We recommend that mold parts to be hard-chromium plated be given a surface finish
of less than 5 micro inches wherever possible before plating and that chromium
plate thicknesses of at least 0.0005 inch be used.