|
|
Ask the Expert Question-and-Answer Archive
(Hard Chrome Plating)
by Larry Zitko, ChromeTech, Inc.
March, 2002
Single Catalyst Vs. Mixed Catalyst Baths
Q.
What would be the speed of the chrome plating bath with a mixed-catalyst (fluoride) compared to a single catalyst bath. Also, what is your advice for converting conventional bath to mixed-catalyst (fluoride) bath.
A.
I have designed and installed more than
a dozen
hard chrome plating lines for companies that built or repaired hydraulic
cylinders. Even though the speed and deposit properties of the
mixed-catalyst
baths are superior to that of the single-catalyst bath, all of my
installations
used the single-catalyst baths. This statement is confusing, so I'll
elaborate.
Here are the typical advantages and
disadvantages
of the two baths:
Single-catalyst
bath
Advantages:
- Low cathodic etch. Areas of
the steel
parts that are in contact with the chromic acid, but are not plated,
are attacked by the acid at a very slow rate.
- Long life expectancy with
antimonial-lead
anodes (6-7% antimony + 93-94% lead).
- Reduced labor due to
reduced masking
requirements. Parts do not have to be protected with wax
or stop-off lacquer to prevent fluid contact. The operator can
prevent
plating by shielding selective areas of the parts from
communicating with
the anodes.
- Aluminum fixtures can be
used.
Aluminum has a good ampacity, and holds up pretty well in the
bath,even
when unprotected.
Disadvantages:
- Unfavorable microcrack
structure: low
population density of deep and wide cracks. This can lead to inferior
corrosion resistance (see next), especially when the cracks extend
through the
entire deposit thickness to the base metal.
- Inferior corrosion resistance
when the
plated steel part is placed into service in aggressive environments.
This is
not as much a disadvantage with hydraulic cylinders that retract
frequently to
recoat the cracks with oil. It would be a major disadvantage on shield
support
cylinders for longwall coal mining operations, for example, where the
hydraulic rods are extended for months or years without
retraction.
- Slower rate of deposition. I
have
typically observed the following rates, using conforming anodes:
- 25.4 u/hr (1.0 mil/hr) @ 31 amps/sq.dm. (2
amp/sq.in.);
- 33.0 u/hr (1.3 mil/hr) @ 47 amps/sq.dm. (3
amp/sq.in.);
- 40.6 u/hr (1.6 mil/hr) @ 62 amps/sq.dm. (4
amp/sq.in.).
These rates
are usually slower when "stick" anodes are used, about
- 19.8 u/hr (0.78 mil/hr) @ 31 amps/sq.dm. (2
amp/sq.in.) for
example.
- Lower cathodic efficiency.
Cathode
current efficiency might be only about 14% at a current
density of
31 amps/sq.dm.This results in higher electrical
consumption, slower rate
of deposition and other consequences.
- Reduced throwing power
compared to some
formulations containing fluoride.
Mixed-catalyst
bath
Advantages:
- Favorable microcrack
structure: high
population density of shallow and narrow cracks. This
can promote superior corrosion resistance (see next), and
better
lubricity.
- Superior corrosion resistance
when the
plated steel part is placed into service in aggressive environments.
- Faster rate of deposition.
The rates, using conforming anodes, for formulations using
fluoride might
be:
- 30.5 u/hr (1.2 mil/hr) @ 31 amps/sq.dm. (2
amp/sq.in.);
- 50.8 u/hr (2.0 mil/hr) @ 47 amps/sq.dm. (3
amp/sq.in.); and
- 73.7 u/hr (2.0 mil/hr) @ 62 amps/sq.dm. (4
amp/sq.in.).
These rates
would only be obtainable with newer, uncontaminated baths and
optimized
plating parameters and
equipment.
- Higher cathodic
efficiency. Cathode
current efficiency might increase to 21% at a current density of 31
amps/sq.dm. This results in reduced electrical
consumption, faster
rate of deposition and other beneficial consequences.
- Improved throwing
power. The baths
are often able to plate into lower current density areas or regions of
parts.
Disadvantages:
- High cathodic etch. Areas of
the steel
parts that are in contact with the chromic acid, but are either not
being
plated or subjected to low current density, are attacked by
the acid
at a fast rate.
- Shorter life expectancy and
different alloy
for anodes. Tin lead anodes are needed for fluoride
baths (6-7% tin
+ 93-94% lead), and they do not hold up as well in the aggressive
chemistry as
the antimonial-lead anodes do in the sulfate bath.
- Chemical attack of plating equipment: Titanium heaters
and
cooling coils cannot be used, more expensive Teflon units are used
instead.
Hood, scrubbers, tanks liners, etc. all have a reduced life
expectancy.
- Increased labor due
to masking
requirements. Parts have to be protected with wax
or stop-off lacquer to prevent fluid contact. This can
significantly add
to labor and disposal costs, and is probably the single biggest factor
that dissuades companies from using the bath for certain
parts.
- Aluminum fixtures cannot be
used.
Unprotected aluminum will dissolve quickly in the
bath, forming
complexes in the bath which tend to reduce the available fluoride
catalyst.
When you consider the labor and etch
penalties
associated with the mixed-catalyst bath, it may not be the best choice,
even
with the deposit characteristics and faster plating rate. If you decide to convert your bath, you may need
to change
heaters, cooling coils, tank liner and anodes. The health risks and
dangers
associated with adding fluoride from a liquid source (example:
hydrofluosilicic acid) has prompted many companies to purchase
more-expensive proprietary additives, which are often in solid form.
You will also have to lower
the sulfate concentration in
your bath, since the mixed-catalyst baths often run only 1.2 g/L (0.16
oz/gal)
sulfate.
Your initial questions asked how to
improve the
corrosion resistance of your deposits. For a given bath, even your
single-catalyst bath, the following items should help:
- Improve the preplate smoothness of the steel parts prior to
plating. The
preplate condition significantly affects the ultimate corrosion
resistance of
the plated part in service.
- Keep the bath impurities as low as possible.
- Keep the bath in chemical balance.
- Plate-polish-plate. For parts requiring heavy buildups, try
grinding or
polishing between two chrome plating cycles. It's an extra step, but
it can significantly increase the corrosion resistance of
the part.
I suspect one of the explanations for this is that the
microcracks from
the first layer are smeared by the polishing and then
the cracks in
the outer layer have a different layout or positioning. With
a
single layer, all cracks that penetrate through the entire coating
will expose
corrosion sites at their base. When you overlay two different crack
patterns,
only a relatively few intersections will form these corrosion
sites.
|
|